RESUMO
Introduction: The Canadian C-spine Rule (CCR) and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) are two criteria designed to rule-out clinically important traumatic cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed the articles comparing the performance of these two models. Methods: Search was done in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science until June 2022. Observational studies with direct comparison of CCR and NEXUS criteria in detection of clinically important cervical SCI were included. Two independent reviewers screened the relevant articles and summarized the data. Certainty of evidence was assessed based on QUADAS-2. Data were recorded as true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative. Then, using "diagma" package and applying weighted random effect model, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: We included 5 studies with direct comparison. Area under the ROC curve of NEXUS in screening of patients with clinically important cervical SCI was 0.708 (95% CI: 0.647 to 0.762). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of NEXUS criteria in screening of patients with clinically important cervical SCI were 0.899 (95% CI: 0.845 to 0.936) and 0.398 (95% CI: 0.315 to 0.488). The positive and negative likelihood ratios of NEXUS were 1.494 (95% CI: 1.146 to 1.949) and 0.254 (95% CI: 1.155 to 1.414), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio of NEXUS was 5.894 (95% CI: 3.372 to 10.305). Furthermore, area under the ROC curve of CCR in screening of clinically important cervical SCI was 0.793 (95% CI: 0.657 to 0.884). Meta-analysis results showed that pooled sensitivity of CCR criteria in screening of patients with clinically important cervical SCI was 0.987 (95% CI: 0.957 to 0.996) and specificity was 0.167 (95% CI: 0.073 to 0.336). The positive and negative likelihood ratios of CCR were 1.184 (95% CI: 0.837 to 1.675) and 0.081 (95% CI: 0.021 to 0.308), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio of CCR was 14.647 (95% CI: 3.678 to 58.336). Conclusion: Based on studies, both CCR and NEXUS were sensitive rules that have the potential to reduce unnecessary imaging in cervical spine trauma patients. However, the low specificity and false-positive results of both of these tools indicate that many people will continue to undergo unnecessary imaging after screening of cervical SCI using these tools. In this meta-analysis, CCR appeared to have better screening accuracy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Seizure severity has been increasingly gaining attention as a complementary assessment to seizure frequency for the measurement of treatment responses. This study aimed to assess the reliability and external validity and of the Persian version of the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ). METHODS: The study sample was recruited from 126 patients with epilepsy who attended the neurology outpatient clinic at Imam Khomeini and Roozbeh hospitals, Tehran, Iran. The Forward-Backward technique was applied to translate the questionnaire. The reliability of SSQ was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The external validity of SSQ was assessed by correlating SSQ scores with Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) subscales. RESULTS: The sample comprised 63 women (50%) and 63 men (50%) aged 13-76â¯years. The mean scores of SSQ items ranged from 3.46 to 5.48. Distribution was skewed for all component scores, with a tendency for the item scores to concentrate toward the highest scores. Reliability for almost all domains were moderate to good, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.615 to 0.770. Component B to D and total score of SSQ had weak-to-moderate inverse correlation with QOLIE-31 subscale scores. However, the result showed no significant correlation with age, sex, or education. CONCLUSION: With some limitations, the Persian version of the SSQ shows relatively good reliability and content validity, supporting its use as a specific measure of seizure severity in epilepsy in Iran.
